This Daily Kos comic tells the story of the dark side of Thomas Friedman's premature paen to economic globalization (The World is Flat).
The man above is sitting on the ruins of a collapsed "high-rise stitching station." While the image refers to Bangladesh's worst industrial disaster ever, it could also take our mind back to what Friedman had predicted about the shifting economy in a "flattening" world.
In essence, he had assigned to the developed West the role of doing sophisticated, often hi-tech, idea-work and the ground, or grunt-work of manufacturing, stitching, putting the special crack and scratch-resistant plexiglass screen on the iphone, etc. to the developing world's endless pool of cheap labor.
Such an acute division of global labor would go on to have disastrous human and environmental consequences. Since Friedman, I believe, can't see beyond his moustaches, he couldn't have foreseen this .
The stitch stations of Bangladesh, just like the assembly shacks of provincial China, housed cheap labor and most of the garment-stitchers were stitching clothes to satisfy the insatiable hunger for bargain clothing in the West.
The pools of cheap labor have turned into cesspools of dead bodies.
(I just dug out this
excellent essay composed by one of my business students (in 2009) in an undergraduate writing class at New York University. I am delighted to see that he had pointed out the dark underbelly of globalization).
Recently Friedman has ceased to sing one-sidedly in praise of economic globalization; he visits the "technology corridors" of otherwise unevenly developed economies like that of India less, and the ruined landscapes more.
But I feel like he still hedges a vital issue.
He
reports back from the city of Taiz in Yemen, where the local population is facing extreme water shortage. Yemeni villages are fighting over, in the real sense of shooting guns and missiles.
Friedman attributes the water scarcity to "mismanagement" of various kinds, but I have a sneaky suspicion that the water in Taiz (as well as in other parts of the developing world) is being smuggled out, with the aiding and abetting of the local authorities, by mega corporations like Pepsi, for instance.
It is a known fact that the water resources in large parts of rural India is used up by corporations like Pepsi and Coca Cola.
What explains the remarkably cheap prices at which gigantic 2 litre bottles of Pepsi are sold in the United States?
